For Christmas I got an interesting present from a pal - my extremely own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, but it’s likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading technology reporter …” - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there’s a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who produced it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone’s name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created “solely to bring humour and delight”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a “customised gag present”, akropolistravel.com and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to broaden his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It’s developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It’s also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and oke.zone it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

“We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really mean human creators’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It’s masterpieces. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that.”

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

“I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals’s work without authorization ought to be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be extremely powerful but let’s build it fairly and relatively.”

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators’ material on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as “madness”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy,” says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth.”

A federal government spokesperson said: “No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their content, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers.”

Under the UK government’s new AI strategy, a national data library including public data from a vast array of sources will likewise be to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “reasonable usage” and are for parentingliteracy.com that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn’t all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector botdb.win over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a “bestseller” I’ll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts since it’s so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I’m not sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.