For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my very own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It’s a fascinating read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it’s also a bit recurring, and wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading innovation journalist …” - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there’s a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can’t - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody’s name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and utahsyardsale.com created “exclusively to bring humour and happiness”.

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a “customised gag present”, larsaluarna.se and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to expand his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It’s designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It’s also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

“We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really imply human creators’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It’s masterpieces. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that.”

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

“I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people’s work without permission need to be banned,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be really effective but let’s construct it morally and relatively.”

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators’ material on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as “insanity”.

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

“Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness,” states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development.”

A federal government spokesperson said: “No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK federal government’s brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a broad variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a of suits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair use” and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable use - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and kenpoguy.com whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a “bestseller” I’ll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it’s so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I’m uncertain the length of time I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.